The family of a teenager killed in a 116 mile-per-hour Tesla crash is suing the company, alleging it makes ‘unreasonably dangerous’ cars

The family of a teenager killed in a 116 mile-per-hour Tesla crash is suing the company, alleging it makes ‘unreasonably dangerous’ cars


A Tesla service technician removed a speed restrictor, without the owner’s permission, that could have saved an 18-year-old’s life by preventing afiery crash last May, the victim’s family alleges in a new lawsuit against the company.

They also accuse Tesla of not doing enough to prevent battery fires in its vehicles

“The Vehicle … was defective when it left the possession of the defendant, Tesla, and was in a condition that was unreasonably dangerous to foreseeable users,”the suit reads.

Edgar Monserratt and Esperanza Martinez, parents of Edgar Monserratt Martinez, say in the lawsuit filed against Tesla and employee James Constantino in Broward County, Florida, on Tuesday that the fiery crash that killed their 18-year-old son and the driver of a 2014 Tesla Model S wouldn’t have happened if the governor had not been removed.

After the car was towed to a storage lot, the Tesla’s battery caught fire again.
NTSB

Federal investigators said in theirpreliminary reportthat the vehicle was traveling at 116 miles per hour around a curve in Fort Lauderdale’s Seabreeze Boulevard — which has a 30 mile-per-hour limit — when the driver, 18-year-old Barrett Riley, attempted to pass another car and lost control of the vehicle.

The Tesla then careened into a brick wall twice and hit a light pole before bursting into flames, which the National Transportation Board said took 200 to 300 gallons of water and foam for the fire department to extinguish.

Monserrrat’s lawsuit claims Tesla should have had better fire-prevention measures in place.

In an interview with Business Insider, the family’s lawyer questioned why the company did not utilizea patent it was awarded in 2011 and that could have possibly reduced the fire’s intensity. In lithium-ion batteries like Tesla’s, a fire in one cell can quickly spread to the others in the battery pack.

“If they had used it on this specific car,” Philip Corboy, of the Chicago-based firm Corboy & Demetrio, said. “Then it would have been a fire that they could have been able to put out, or something where the passengers could have gotten out in time. But it became an inferno within seconds of when they crashed — there really was not too much the kids could do. They were stuck in an inferno.”

Witness videos show a massive fire following the crash.
Florida Sentinel

Read more:Elon Musk urges potential Tesla buyers in China to order cars now to fund the new Gigafactory

The 2014 Tesla Model S involved in the crash has afive-star safety rating from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, but batteries have been a source of headache for firefighters and other first-responders. Investigators said the battery caught fire a second time at the storage yard following the crash in May.

In December,a Model S burst into flames twice following a flat tirein Los Gatos, California. And in June, a Model S suddenly caught fire while sitting in traffic onSanta Monica Boulevard in Los Angeles.

Still, Tesla has previously maintained that its cars catch fire far less often than traditional gasoline-powered cars.

“Our thoughts continue to be with the families affected by this tragedy,” a Tesla spokesperson said in a statement.

“Unfortunately, no car could have withstood a high-speed crash of this kind. Tesla’s Speed Limit Mode, which allows Tesla owners to limit their car’s speed and acceleration, was introduced as an over-the-air update last year in dedication to our customer’s son, Barrett Riley, who tragically passed away in the accident.”

Read the full complaint:

Read More

Be the first to comment on "The family of a teenager killed in a 116 mile-per-hour Tesla crash is suing the company, alleging it makes ‘unreasonably dangerous’ cars"

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*